AI Legal Chatbot
Documents
Cases
Laws
Law Firms
LPMS
Quizzes
Login
Join
Bog Dr. Aloo Gumbi Mixed Sec. School v Florence Onyango Aloo [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Court
High Court of Kenya at Kisumu
Category
Civil
Judge(s)
T.W. Cherere
Judgment Date
October 23, 2020
Country
Kenya
Document Type
PDF
Number of Pages
2
Case Summary
Full Judgment
Explore the case summary of Bog Dr. Aloo Gumbi Mixed Sec. School v Florence Onyango Aloo [2020] eKLR, detailing the court's findings and implications for legal education. Perfect for legal scholars and practitioners.
Case Brief: Bog Dr. Aloo Gumbi Mixed Sec. School v Florence Onyango Aloo [2020] eKLR
1. Case Information:
- Name of the Case: The Bog Dr. Aloo Gumbi Mixed Sec. School v. Florence Onyango Aloo
- Case Number: Misc Civil Application No. 117 of 2020
- Court: High Court of Kenya at Kisumu
- Date Delivered: October 23, 2020
- Category of Law: Civil
- Judge(s): T.W. Cherere
- Country: Kenya
2. Questions Presented:
The central legal issue in this case is whether the Applicant, The Bog Dr. Aloo Gumbi Mixed Sec. School, should be granted leave to appeal out of time against a judgment delivered in favor of the Respondent, Florence Onyango Aloo.
3. Facts of the Case:
The Applicant, a mixed secondary school, was aggrieved by a judgment delivered on February 13, 2019, in Maseno PMCC 161 of 2013, which favored the Respondent. Following this judgment, the Applicant filed a notice of motion on June 8, 2020, seeking an extension of time to lodge an appeal, citing delays in obtaining certified copies of the necessary documents as the reason for the delay. The Respondent opposed the application, arguing that the delay was not adequately explained.
4. Procedural History:
The case originated from a civil suit where the trial court ruled in favor of the Respondent. The Applicant's subsequent motion for an extension of time to appeal was filed after the statutory period for lodging an appeal had lapsed. The motion was supported by an affidavit from the Applicant's secretary, while the Respondent countered with her own affidavit opposing the application.
5. Analysis:
- Rules: The court considered
Section 95 of the Civil Procedure Act
, which allows for the enlargement of time for filing appeals, and Order 50 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which provides the court with the discretion to extend time limits. Additionally,
Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act
specifies that appeals must be filed within thirty days of the decree or order.
- Case Law: The court referenced the case of Eliud Buku Thuku v. Beatrice Wambui Mwangi [2013] eKLR, which outlined the parameters for granting an extension of time, including the length of delay, reasons for the delay, chances of success on appeal, and potential prejudice to the Respondent. The court also cited Simon Thuo Mwangi v. Unga Feeds Limited [2015] eKLR, which emphasized that judicial discretion should not be used to assist parties who deliberately seek to obstruct justice.
- Application: In applying the rules and case law to the facts, the court noted that the Applicant had been aware of the judgment since February 2019 but only sought to appeal in July 2020, an eight-month delay that was deemed excessive and inadequately explained. The court found that the Applicant failed to provide sufficient material to justify the exercise of discretion in their favor.
6. Conclusion:
The court dismissed the Applicant's motion for an extension of time to appeal, concluding that the delay was overly inordinate and not satisfactorily explained. The ruling emphasizes the importance of timely action in civil proceedings and the discretionary nature of the court's powers in such matters.
7. Dissent:
There were no dissenting opinions noted in this case.
8. Summary:
The High Court of Kenya ruled against The Bog Dr. Aloo Gumbi Mixed Sec. School, denying their request for an extension of time to appeal a prior judgment in favor of Florence Onyango Aloo. The decision underscores the necessity for litigants to act promptly and provides guidance on the court's discretionary powers regarding extensions of time in civil matters. The ruling has implications for future cases regarding the timeliness of appeals and the need for adequate justification for delays.
Document Summary
Below is the summary preview of this document.
This is the end of the summary preview.
📢 Share this document with your network
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Related Documents
Clement Thadeo Mfashe & another v Sparta Foods Limited & another [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Johnson Lisamula Murila v Presbyterian Church Hospital & another [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Sameh Textiles Industries Limited v Oriental Commercial Bank Limited [2020] eKLR Case Summary
L.G. Menezes & Company Advocates v African Merchant Assurance Company Limited; Diamond Trust Bank Limited (Garnishee) [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Timoty Nderi v. Safaricom Limited Case Summary
In the matter of Bizone Limited [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Bernard Njiinu Njiraini v Clerk of the National Assembly & another; Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Industrialisation, Trade & Enterprise Development & 4 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Kenyatta University Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme v Athi Water Services Board & 3 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Milton Nyakundi Oriku v Sports Disputes Tribunal [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Republic v National Government Constituencies Development Fund Board & another Exparte Nelson Mwenda Paul & 2 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Maina & Maina Advocates v Benedict Kabugi Ndungu [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Patel Ravji Lalji v Attorney General & 2 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
ICEA Lion General Insurance Company v Chris Ndolo Mutuku t/a Crystal Charlotte Beach Resort [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Alfred Nyandieka v Director of Public Prosecutions & 2 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Republic v Director of Public Prosecutions & 3 others Ex Parte Zhang Aixian; Jiang Baoqui & 3 others (Interested parties) [2020] eKLR Case
Republic v Speaker of the Nairobi County Assembly & 4 others Ex parte Maurice Otieno Gari [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Republic v. The Constituency Development Board & Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission Ex Parte Thomas Mongare Moindi, Philemon M. Apiemi, Mary K. Ondieki, and John A. Onyancha [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Aidah Muthambi Ndonye v Michael Maweu Munzyu [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Republic v Law Society of Kenya & another Ex Parte Neddie Eve Akello; Marianne Jebet Kitany (Interested Party) [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Aloo Gumbi Mixed Sec. School v OCO (minor suing thro ’next friend RAO [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Kipkai Enterprises v Maurine Louise Osembe [2020] eKLR Case Summary
David Kamau Ndege v Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health & 2 others; Public Service Commission & another (Interested Parties) [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Kengen Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme Limited v Villa Care Limited [2020] eKLR Case Summary
View all summaries